[Ken H]

Madison is describing the Dormant (Negative) Commerce Clause, used "among the states themselves". We've been over this before.

Yes, and your fraudulent interpretation of Madison was refuted.

So was your distortion of Justice John Marshall's use of the term "Commerce Clause in its dormant state".

[robertpaulsen]

"Yes, and your fraudulent interpretation of Madison was refuted."

If by "refuted" you mean that you held your breath, stomped your foot, and whined that it wasn't true, then yeah, it was refuted.

Now, if by "refuted" you mean that you presented a logical argument, that you carefully dissected Madison's words, that you supported your interpretation with outside quotes and cites, and that you supplied proof with actual court cases that reflected your interpretation, then, no, it was not refuted.

Not even close.