Huh? Since it's obvious from your earlier questions that you don't understand the case, I gave you the link to the decision at issue so that you could maybe read it. I never even gave you my opinion; regardless, whether I'm "against federalism"--whatever that means--is irrelevant to the facts of the case.
I think he might have a point wrt the "Render unto Ceasar" reference. Ceasar is getting due an ass kicking over the Commerce Clause, IMHO.