Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: SigPro2340
The conclusion however, I will agree with that.

Thanks for the straight answer.

Is there some reason you won't give an equally straight answer on the substantial effects test?

102 posted on 03/05/2005 12:15:18 AM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H
"At an appropriate juncture, I think we must modify our Commerce Clause jurisprudence. Today, it is easy enough to say that the Clause certainly does not empower Congress to ban gun possession within 1,000 feet of a school."

I very much agree with this.

What does that have to do with drugs or anything else?

Clearly government should not limit gun ownership or carrying as regards to a simple 2nd amendment test.

I'm confused at how you can extrapolate the gun issue to illegal drugs or other gun laws that are not spoken of in this case.
103 posted on 03/05/2005 12:18:24 AM PST by SigPro2340
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson