To: orionblamblam
I still can't figure out how sexuality "randomnly" came into being by means of evolution. In order for sexuality to be successful and carry on it requires the presence of both sexes, otherwise it will die out as it is unable to reproduce. For instance, you couldn't have a male evolve first, and then a female generations down the road as the male would have died out because of his inability to reproduce. Both sexes are needed at the exact same time. It would seem that if the process is guided randomnly and by survival instincts, asexual organisms would have reigned supreme.
What are the odds of two different members of the same species developing opposing biological features that work perfectly when joined in union with the other for something as crucial as procreation? Sounds planned to me.
9 posted on
02/25/2005 2:01:27 PM PST by
mike182d
("Let fly the white flag of war." - Zapp Brannigan)
To: mike182d
In order for sexuality to be successful and carry on it requires the presence of both sexes, otherwise it will die out as it is unable to reproduce Ever heard of asexual reproduction?
11 posted on
02/25/2005 2:11:39 PM PST by
gdani
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson