Skip to comments.
Laboratory Speciation in Helianthus Evolves a Native Species
furball4paws
Posted on 02/15/2005 7:12:00 AM PST by furball4paws
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-164 next last
To: Rudder
Got the wrong word - it's ovoviparous hatch inside
Oviparous - hatch outside
61
posted on
02/15/2005 9:10:06 AM PST
by
furball4paws
(It's not the cough that carried him off - it's the coffin they carried him off in (O. Nash -I think))
To: furball4paws
Close, very close. It's actually "ovoviviparous."
62
posted on
02/15/2005 9:12:58 AM PST
by
Rudder
To: Rudder
I stand corrected - and getting into the category of a tongue twister, too.
Doesn't look like the fishing's too good today. Now if we just had a Man/Dog thing.
63
posted on
02/15/2005 9:17:54 AM PST
by
furball4paws
(It's not the cough that carried him off - it's the coffin they carried him off in (O. Nash -I think))
To: Stultis
Why do you have to go and confuse this issue with all that science stuff? This isn't about science; God did it!!! /creationist mode
64
posted on
02/15/2005 9:22:34 AM PST
by
stremba
To: balrog666
I am never sure whether I should bite or smile at these things. Since I started it I felt smiling was better, but with this guy I don't think he'd be satisfied with anything other than pulling the thread.
So - here's some primordial ooze in his eye.
65
posted on
02/15/2005 9:59:02 AM PST
by
furball4paws
(It's not the cough that carried him off - it's the coffin they carried him off in (O. Nash -I think))
To: PatrickHenry
It's Just a Theory
(with apologies to Blue Oyster Cult)
Darwin's time has come
Evolution now is gone
Creos don't like the theory
We're certain it's just plain wrong.
They can be like we are
Come on creos ... It's just a theory
No need to listen ... It's just a theory
Darwin's on the outs ... It's just a theory
All his links are missin'...
S. J. Gould is done
P.E. now is gone
Behe, Miller, Hovind
Will now tell us how it's done
Behe, Miller, Hovind...
Americans believe the creos ... Behe, Miller, Hovind
Americans believe the creos ... Tell us how it's done
And more are joining us everyday ... You can be like we are
Come on creos ... It's just a theory
No need to listen ... It's just a theory
Darwin's on the outs ... It's just a theory
All his links are missin'...
Evolutionary biology
Was here but now it's gone
We'll replace it with ID
Regardless if it's really wrong
We regard it as a kind of tool
It's just a wedge to get God in school
To see how many we can fool
Saying, "join the creos..."
Come on creos ... And then they came
Flocked in droves ... We ain't no slime
Turned the clock backward in time
You'll become like we are
No need for research
You'll become like we are
Come on creos ... It's just a theory
66
posted on
02/15/2005 10:27:06 AM PST
by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: furball4paws
Good stuff. Thanks for posting it.
67
posted on
02/15/2005 10:31:18 AM PST
by
b_sharp
(Atheist does not mean liberal and Scientist does not mean communist.)
To: furball4paws
"I douby that too many creationoids will come out for this " Don't be too sure, they'll find something in there that helps their cause, at least in their minds.
Besides, it's still just a flower. It didn't evolve into a Lama or anything.
68
posted on
02/15/2005 10:34:02 AM PST
by
b_sharp
(Atheist does not mean liberal and Scientist does not mean communist.)
To: Sola Veritas
"Plant hybridization hardly proves evolution - it is unique to plant "design". Stop wasting bandwidth with this nonsense. This has been debated to death without resolution. All it does is to start endless fights that don't accomplish anything." Of course, but everything is unique to "design". In otherwords, goddidit.
No matter what is shown to speciate it will never show the veracity of evolution. Is this close to the truth from your view?
69
posted on
02/15/2005 10:38:59 AM PST
by
b_sharp
(Atheist does not mean liberal and Scientist does not mean communist.)
To: PatrickHenry
Too late. They beat you to it.
70
posted on
02/15/2005 10:39:54 AM PST
by
b_sharp
(Atheist does not mean liberal and Scientist does not mean communist.)
To: VadeRetro
"But even bullfrogs don't come out looking like bullfrogs. They look like -- fish. At least for a time.' But they taste like chicken.
71
posted on
02/15/2005 10:41:33 AM PST
by
b_sharp
(Atheist does not mean liberal and Scientist does not mean communist.)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
"H. anomalus, H. deserticola and H. paradoxus hybrids since God created them."
Sorry to disappoint you, but H. anomalus and H. paradoxus and H. deserticola are not hybrids. They are separate species, by anyone's definition of the word.
72
posted on
02/15/2005 10:48:41 AM PST
by
furball4paws
(It's not the cough that carried him off - it's the coffin they carried him off in (O. Nash -I think))
To: b_sharp
If an atheist is a Liberal and a scientist is a Communist - whate is an atheist scientist. I mean if two negatives make a positive we must have ----- SUPER DUDE!!
73
posted on
02/15/2005 10:51:08 AM PST
by
furball4paws
(It's not the cough that carried him off - it's the coffin they carried him off in (O. Nash -I think))
To: Dimensio
Wrong definition. When dealing with creationists, "microevolution" is the stuff that they have to admit has occured because it has been observed, and "macroevolution" is the "stuff that will never happen, ever" until it does happen, at which point that specific event -- and nothing else -- suddenly falls into the category of "microevolution" (with no apologies for claiming that it was impossible in the first place). ...because we are at war with Eastasia. We've always been at war with Eastasia.
To: furball4paws
I'm not sure whether I should thank you or simply take my bows. Hmmm. Maybe I'll just give up my intellect and go creationist. Nope. Too scary.
75
posted on
02/15/2005 10:54:06 AM PST
by
b_sharp
(Atheist does not mean liberal and Scientist does not mean communist.)
To: PatrickHenry
Is there any chance that this thread could be put back into the forum where it began? This is a good science thread, and all the others like it are posted in, and remain in, the "news/activism" forum. I second the motion. I also note the flaming was started by someone who doesn't like these threads.
To: furball4paws
To: furball4paws
You know, looking over this article for my own reference (possilbe, in the future) of it, I don't see the exact reference. Where was it published, when, etc? Or am I missing something?
Thanks,
To: furball4paws
>Sorry to disappoint you, but H. anomalus and H. paradoxus and H. deserticola are not hybrids. They are separate species, by anyone's definition of the word.
You might want to read the article you posted. It was somewhat interesting. [Evoids can read, can't they?]
"The laboratory derived H. anomalus readily crosses with the native H. anomalus. Results indicate that H. deserticola and H. paradoxus may also have arisen via hybridization of H. annuus and H. petiolarus fallax."
79
posted on
02/15/2005 12:04:29 PM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
80
posted on
02/15/2005 12:11:16 PM PST
by
js1138
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-164 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson