[drt1]

I wholeheartedly agree with that statement. The unfortunate part though is that there are those here who would attack it as Racist, Xenophobic, Ethnocentric or any one of another derogatory 'Nasty' words they love to use to marginalize the debate.

IMO That kind of behavior and the apparent tolerance of it on FR while, at the same time, appearing to silence other voices is the spark to this whole Immigration imbroglio.

[Dane]

I wholeheartedly agree with that statement. The unfortunate part though is that there are those here who would attack it as Racist, Xenophobic, Ethnocentric or any one of another derogatory 'Nasty' words they love to use to marginalize the debate.

IMO That kind of behavior and the apparent tolerance of it on FR while, at the same time, appearing to silence other voices is the spark to this whole Immigration imbroglio

Oh sheesh, the "cyber-martyr" rhetoric in full bloom, how charles rangel.

[F16Fighter]

"There are those here who would attack it as Racist, Xenophobic, Ethnocentric or any one of another derogatory 'Nasty' words they love to use to marginalize the debate....

That kind of behavior and the apparent tolerance of it on FR while, at the same time, appearing to silence other voices is the spark to this whole Immigration imbroglio."

Spot on.

When the message and messenger of the truth is demonized, it's clear the last line of "defense" from the opposition is overrun.

Who usually engages in this style of attacking the truth? Barabra Boxer, Al Sharpton -- in short, the Left.