Thank you for your reply. I wasn't going to reply to your previous post because I didn't want to antagonize you. That is a consise statement of your position on the issue, and I didn't read anything in there that I can disagree with. Again, thanks.
Perhaps now you understand why I get angry.
Not only is it concise, but I've been consistently arguing the same point for nearly five years, yet on this thread, someone questions whether I support Arizona's proposition 200 when in fact, much of what I consider to be a solution for the problem of illegal immigration is part of Prop. 200, and I wrote that editorial at least a year before the Prop. 200 movement got under way!