I thought you were refering to 1783. You might want to read 1783.
Anyway, if you read the whole thread, you will find many posters (not just me) who say the anit immigrationist do have a few racists on their side. Further, the existance of stormfront.org also indicates that some and definitely not all and not even very many people on the anti immigration side are racists or lean that way.
I was merely trying to explain why only the strong advocates of anit immigration were banned. The moderates generally use facts. The stonger anti immigrants also mostly use facts. And then there are a few racists who are mostly from the stronly anti immigrant wing. It is the few racists who are banned and that is going to be from the stongly anti immigrant wing.
Sorry I thought you were commenting on 1783 and not 1789. I hope that clears things up.
BTW, I'm often on the anti-illegal immigration threads and the most genuinely racist posts are those made by the pro-amnesty types.