To: TigersEye
"You are right that I would like pot to be legal."See? We're making progress.
Now, if it could be shown that legalizing pot for adults would result in an increase of pot smoking among kids, would you then be against the legalization of pot?
Or don't you care?
To: robertpaulsen
Now, if it could be shown that legalizing pot for adults would result in an increase of pot smoking among kids, would you then be against the legalization of pot? Can we plaease go one thread without the "for the children" nonsense. As George Carlin says "F#$k the children!"
408 posted on
02/04/2005 10:26:26 AM PST by
jmc813
(The Supreme Court is worthless. Sorry Terri.)
To: robertpaulsen
Now, if it could be shown that legalizing pot for adults would result in an increase of pot smoking among kids, would you then be against the legalization of pot? Or don't you care? For someone who has just been shown to be ethically and morally bankrupt in his debating practices and has shown no sense of guilt or apology for it the above attempt to herd me into an ethical corner with logic constructed from a false dichotomy is pathetic to say the least.
411 posted on
02/04/2005 10:34:10 AM PST by
TigersEye
(Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
To: robertpaulsen
Now, if it could be shown that legalizing pot for adults would result in an increase of pot smoking among kids, would you then be against the legalization of pot? Or don't you care?
You must be losing the debate again. You've had to resort to asking loaded questions.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson