Because obviously the issue was never on whether or not this guy was likely a hispanic --- that was established from the start --- but certain people insist that he cannot possibly be from the recent immigrant group of hispanics --- and that to think he is is extremely racist because he just has to be from a long-time American-hispanic group.
Which to me is absurd because the latter is generally not a violent crime group and to have to assume he's from one of them --- or all hispanics have equal crime rates is to me a worse kind of racism. If the old immigrant group and the non-immigrant group has a low rate of violent crime --- why must we assume he's one of them or has an equal chance of being of them versus assuming he's of the recent arrival group?
LOL!!! You're extrapolating waaaayyyy too much.
No one was making THAT assertion nor generalization.
LOL!!!!
If that is what you have understood, you need to work on your reading comprehension. The point is that you cannot tell, simply by hearing a name, whether someone is a illegal alien or not. Which makes those that jump to conclusions about alien satus wrong on two accounts: 1) They cannot tell the status, and 2) It is irrelevant.