Did negritochulo simply not understand that what he was posting was directly contrary to what he himself was asserting?
Regardless of whether or not it is a criticism of Behe's book is irrelevant. As I stated Behe himself isn't a creationist. The point is on the page that I indicated it does support the statements on chemistry that I posted earlier. Evolutionist are constantly contradicting other evolutionist. That's a given. That's what makes the whole theory so hard to swallow!
If the primitive earth atmosphere contained a significant quantity of oxygen, however, an evolutionary origin of life would have been thermodynamically impossible, since all substances would have been oxidized to carbon dioxide, water, nitrogen, and other oxidized products, leaving no organic chemical compounds to serve as precursors for biochemical evolution. Evolutionists are thus forced to assume, a priori, that the primitive earth atmosphere contained no oxygen, but rather contained hydrogen, and that carbon existed mainly in the form of methane and/or carbon monoxide.IMPACT No. 31 January 1976
by Duane T. Gish, Ph.D.**