Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: brazzaville
The most important benefit was that the Federals were able to assume the moral high ground.

OK, if you say so. There's many on both sides who'd disagree.

297 posted on 01/07/2005 8:43:19 AM PST by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu l’aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]


To: mac_truck
Good morning.

I'm not sure what you and those others are disagreeing to.

Do you interpret what I wrote to mean that I think the Federals actually had the moral high ground? I don't.

Do you disagree with the idea that an assumption of moral superiority is important to an aggressor trying to impose it's will on others. It's easier to burn another guys farm if you think you are doing it for 'moral' reasons. I guess it's true that the strategic and tactical importance of morale would be a matter of opinion.

My ancestors fought for the Confederacy. That influences my perspective on the war of Northern Aggression. What makes you hold to different views? I'm not flaming, just asking out of curiosity.

Michael Frazier
318 posted on 01/07/2005 9:47:23 AM PST by brazzaville (No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson