Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
When it came to removing injustices, however, it was Madison's intent that the states themselves do it rather than Congress.

And after repeated requests, you can produce no evidence to support such a grammatically convoluted interpretatation of this letter. What evidence do you have in the other writings of the Founders that it is necessary to attribute such a strained construction in order to make it consistent with the intent of the clause expressed in those other writings? If no such evidence exists, why even engage in the exercis, and on what basis do you deem this the "correct" interpretation over the grammatically apparent one?

799 posted on 01/17/2005 11:24:35 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 794 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
"you can produce no evidence to support such a grammatically convoluted interpretatation of this letter"

It's how the clause is actually being used in the courts. I'd say that's pretty damn good evidence. Where's yours?

804 posted on 01/17/2005 11:41:48 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson