"Are you expecting that arguing that "correcting injustices" is a "positive purpose", you can get any "positive purpose" through the door on the same pass?"
You betcha. Assuming it's constitutional, of course.
You betcha. Assuming it's constitutional, of course.
Why, and by what standard is it "constitutional"? Are you looking for the Founder's original intent, or searching for "emanations and penumbras" to justify pursuit of a political agenda?