Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
The problem with a blockade (as I understand it) is that one can only blockade another power (as Stephens put it), not ones own ports.

If a nation declares a blockade it is an act of war against another power and we were claiming that the South was still in the Union.

It was like declaring war on oneself.

910 posted on 01/13/2005 4:35:25 AM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration
The problem with a blockade (as I understand it) is that one can only blockade another power (as Stephens put it), not ones own ports.

The southron contingent love to trot that out as sort of a left-handed recognition of confederate sovereignty by the Lincoln Administration, but I'm not aware of any international treaty or Constitutional clause that prevents it. Nor am I aware of anything that equates a blockade of one's own borders with war. We weren't blockading France after all. And are we not in effect blockading our own borders today by throwing out drug interdiction screens and border patrols?

912 posted on 01/13/2005 4:41:22 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Jefferson Davis - the first 'selected, not elected' president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 910 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson