And when the 'People'want to change a tyrannical gov't they always have the moral right to revolt, not to secede There you go again, advocating violence. The Southern states had no revolt in mind. Do you think they wanted to go in and takeover Washington? You probably do if you were educated anywhere in the North in a goverment school. But, of course, if that is the case, you have more problems than can be solved by debate.
And when the 'People'want to change a tyrannical gov't they always have the moral right to revolt, not to secede There you go again, advocating violence. The Southern states had no revolt in mind. Do you think they wanted to go in and takeover Washington? You probably do if you were educated anywhere in the North in a goverment school. But, of course, if that is the case, you have more problems than can be solved by debate. When you throw off a gov't it usually leads to violence.
When you revolt, you are appealing to bullets instead of ballots, the very thing Lincoln wanted to prove was not necessary in a republican form of gov't.