[Non-Sequitur]

You have documentation that "the entire world agreed", of course. Post up. Stop lying and start documenting "the entire world agreed".

Want to split hairs, huh? OK, how about not a single country in the world indicated that they believed in confederate sovereignty by recognizing them as such? Is that better?

[GOPcapitalist]

K, how about not a single country in the world indicated that they believed in confederate sovereignty by recognizing them as such?

Funny. Prior to the German unification in 1918, Saxe Coburg and Gotha was a country, and they recognized the CSA. Seems like you are either wrong or lying again.

[lentulusgracchus]

OK, how about not a single country in the world indicated that they believed in confederate sovereignty by recognizing them as such? Is that better?

No, it isn't. Trying to crib silence into an endorsement of your side is a nice try, but you have some documenting to do before anyone on FR will accept your broad-brush claim.

Far from splitting hairs, I'm giving you a reverse Mohawk. You need one -- you have bad habits in discourse, you don't play well with others, and you fib a lot.

Getting Catholic with you for a minute, fibbing by omission, implication, or silence is just as sinful as telling people that Lincoln only wanted peace and freedom, or that "it was all about slavery".

So don't start.