Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration
What you have admitted is that you are unable to assail the Dred Scott decision on any legal basis.

We have courts of law.

That is the difference between B.S. and reality.

1,531 posted on 01/25/2005 4:01:05 AM PST by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1529 | View Replies ]


To: nolu chan
The Dred Scott decision was immoral and therefore illegal.

As for assailing it's legality, that has done by legal scholars already-as you well know.

It is even questioned if the Court had a right to make a ruling on the case in the first place.

Law isn't what man says it is, law must reflect what God says it is.

1,533 posted on 01/25/2005 4:09:36 AM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1531 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson