Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur; TexConfederate1861; nolu chan
[TexConfed] Well, it seems some well known historians and jurists DISAGREE with you. Nolu Chan is right. The proof could be in front of your face, and you wouldn't believe it.

[N-S] Nolu chan? Nolu interested.

Tex, this is another good example of Non-Sequitur's moral arrogance. Here nolu chan has been bringing in source documents until hell won't have it to back up his opinions (remember that "your opinion" sneer N-S directed to me at least twice in the last 100 posts?), and "Nolu interested" is the response.

N-S, buddy, I'm going to make a hobby out of busting your chops on this stuff. If nc brings in a pile of testimony supporting his contention that A did to B but not C, then either have the good grace to stipulate to it, or offer a demurrer -- but don't patronize and belittle us with this "you're just spamming"/<yawn> stuff. (Capitan does that, too.)

The reason nolu chan posts it twice is that you repeatedly ignore the evidence he adduces and just tell him his posts don't count.

You don't play by different rules, poster. Just telling people they don't have an argument and just waving them off is BS.

</flame off>

1,340 posted on 01/18/2005 4:13:05 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1270 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus
N-S, buddy, I'm going to make a hobby out of busting your chops on this stuff.

Well, everybody has to have a hobby I guess.

1,344 posted on 01/18/2005 4:42:47 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1340 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson