You realize that the author of this piece was the canon lawyer who defended the "Hawaii six"? He even mentions it in the article.
Cardinal Ratzinger's decision reversing the excommunication of six members of the faithful in Honolulu is used in an attempt to legitimatize the SSPX. As most of you know, the St. Joseph Foundation assisted in defending the "Hawaii Six" and I can say that the status of the Society was not at issue in that case. What was at issue was the conduct of the defendants which, while admittedly blameworthy in some respects, did not constitute schism. The records of the case show that the former Bishop of Honolulu, Most Rev. Joseph Ferrario, tried to use penal law to silence chose six Catholics who were calling the attention of the public to what they perceived as the bishop's follies and misdeeds. Cardinal Ratzinger has never explicitly or implicitly approved of the actions of the SSPX.
"You realize that the author of this piece was the canon lawyer who defended the "Hawaii six"? He even mentions it in the article."
Nope. That would be letting the facts get in the way of their own private opinions again. I doubt many of the SSPXers have even read the article past the headline. And besides, their spiritual director priests probably forbid them from reading things other than what they are provided from their chapels.