Not officially.
But it is a good bet.
In his previous thread(s) he claimed to be conservative and pushed Buchanan as a 'true conservative'.
Somewhat akin to the screed he put in the bottom of the article from the UT.
Note that the article of the Bride of UT has a rant about "no matter how conservative" an article he posts he gets banned.
Ah, so it's not official, merely speculation backed up by a certain amount of suspicious circumstantial evidence. I see...