[rogerv]

Thankfully, none. Between you and me, I'd like to keep it that way!

[KJacob]

Thankfully, none. Between you and me, I'd like to keep it that way!

Your post says you are concerned with the erosion of civil liberties yet none of yours have been eroded. What makes you think some will?

[Velveeta]

So, none of your civil liberties has been eroded, but you're complaining about your civil liberties being eroded?


I better worry about quitting smoking today, because SOMEDAY....I might start.

[subterfuge]

I figure rogerv is just pimping his or someone's web site. Not answering posts, wants us to "come on over."

Are we too quick or were you kidding about conversing?

[Ditto]

Between you and me, I'd like to keep it that way!

Maybe you can help me out. What's the difference between a "Civil" liberty and an inalienable right?

If a Civil liberty can be granted by the state, can the state also revoke that liberty?

[risk]

Between you and me, I'd like to keep it that way!

I have a hypothetical question for you. Let's say that your civil liberties were being eroded significantly, and those of many of your neighbors, friends, and relatives.

What would you do about it?

Now stop and consider who is trying to revoke your natural, inborn, second amendment-guarded right to own military-grade semi-automatic weapons. It's not President Bush. It's not Attorney General Ashcroft. It's not even The Evil Vice President Cheney or Defense Secretary Rumsfeld.

It's a lot of liberals in and out of government who claim to be defending your human rights.

This is the stuff holocausts are made of.