Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H
"How about a reduction in supply and demand?"

Reduction in supply? So we can have an increase in the number of users forcing up the price because of a reduction in supply and that's a success?

Reduction in demand? So we can have an increase in the number of users, but the total amount they consume drops, and that's a success?

Geez, if I used the above as proof of success, you'd (rightfully) laugh me off this board.

How about: The percentage of those 12 and older using drugs has dropped/remained flat? That seems like a good measure of success.

64 posted on 12/07/2004 10:55:38 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Reduction in supply? So we can have an increase in the number of users forcing up the price because of a reduction in supply and that's a success?

You lost me there. I thought reduction in drug supply was one of the goals of the WOD. Drug supply has increased.

Reduction in demand? So we can have an increase in the number of users, but the total amount they consume drops, and that's a success?

I have no idea what you're talking about. Where's that bunny with the pancake?

Geez, if I used the above as proof of success, you'd (rightfully) laugh me off this board.

I thought the point of elevating the WOD to the cabinet level was to reduce supply and demand. Maybe not?

68 posted on 12/07/2004 11:13:18 AM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson