Can't we finish dealing with the old arguments before you wheel in a whole bunch of new ones. Have you worked out why those falsifications that Theobald suggests wouldn't falsify ToE yet?
A fish that jumps close to the right place gets more flies and passes on the tendency to jump close to the right place. The better it gets at it the more advantage it has.
A proto-woodpecker with a beak only marginally bigger or stronger than other birds gets more insects to eat and is more likely to pass on the genes that keep it from going hungry.
Actually I don't care what Theobald says, a quick perusal assures me it is just another in the enless semantic tricks of evolutionists, and if the pre-Cambrian explosion of life is NOT enough falsification of this theory, then what possibly could be?