And none of this contradicts the Mosaic account. your point, please? As for Antarctica, is there any proof those fossils couldn't have arrived there during the flood?
And none of this contradicts the Mosaic account. your point, please? As for Antarctica, is there any proof those fossils couldn't have arrived there during the flood?
But it completely contradicts the ICR flood geology hypotheses. And marsupial fossils are *only* found in Australasia and Antarctica. Have you worked out why that is yet? (hint: it is really easy to see why if you reject flood nonsense and accept mainstream science of plate tectonics and ToE)
None of the stuff that you mention explains the phenomena that are seen in real strata in the real world, like interposed fully-formed fossil coral beds, like fossilised burrows, like thick layers of powdery material where the powder is so fine that the grains take years to fall onto the sediment, Like interposed igneous strata, coal formations, like radiometric dates that get steadily and consistently older the deeper down the column we go etc etc etc.
And none of this contradicts the Mosaic account. your point, please? As for Antarctica, is there any proof those fossils couldn't have arrived there during the flood?
B: There's no evidence for a Noachian deluge. Period.