Replies

"Why do evolutionists continue to attack and bludgeon Creationists if neither "side" can prove their world views?"
Because it is all about being able to test and falsify. You cannot falsify creationism and therefore you can't test it. So it is not science. We are talking about science classes, not Actual Truth classes. Even if evolution is ultimately wrong it is still a scientific theory and those should definitely be taught in a science class.

"The answer is simply this: Evolution is allegedly the antidote to Christianity, and the secularists, in their never ending quest to purge morality from society must first kill the originator of Morality."

Kids that want to do biology at college level will need to be given some head start from high school. If they don't even know what evolution is then they are going to find it harder than the kid in the next state who at least has an idea of what it is.

"It is so much more easier to slaughter children in the womb if the biomass inside a woman is not human life. It becomes much more easier to exterminate people groups from the earth (ie, Jews, the unborn, old people, the terminally ill and deformed) if we are all animals of the same level as beasts and bugs."
Okay this is just weird I have no idea why you have suddenly changed topic, especially as you are now promoting killing children and Jews. You know you should read about ww2 and what happened.

"Because mankind is an accident of Chance, some species of man are more human than others, which makes it perfectly fine to incarcerate aboriginals in zoos and make lampshades out of others."
I don't know what stuff you are into but all people are equal regardless of race.

Kids that want to do biology at college level will need to be given some head start from high school. If they don't even know what evolution is then they are going to find it harder than the kid in the next state who at least has an idea of what it is.

And exactly what advance in technology has come about because of an evolutionary world view? I dare say that because evolutionary thinking has corrupted the prejudices of scientific investigators, true advances have been brought to a halt.

For instance, evolutionary thinking tells us that things improve with age, that information is added to biological systems through beneficial mutation. Creationism tells us that over time, biological systems degrade and lose information. Which worldview do you think gives us better pesticides? Creationism. How? Because the advances in pesticides have banked on the fact that resilient strains of critters come about because of a loss of genetic information rather than the organism mutating beneficially to resist the chemicals.

A critter used to die because the chemical effected a particular enzyme within the organism. When strains of critters resisted the chemical and populated without competition with their enzyme equipped counterparts, it required researchers to find another enzyme to exploit. The bottom line is, the resisting critter has less genetic information than the nonresisting critter.

This is why we have more resistant foods that have significantly lower nutritional value. As science is forced to deal with making resistant strains of crops, the resulting products continue to lose genetic information. This is why you can't let your hogs loose in the corn fields after the harvest like grand-daddy did, they will end up malnurished.