The refutation of MichaelAngelos link to Camp's article is here. Both Camp's article and Theobalds subsequent refutation were referenced on page 1 of the original article that I gave you so presumably you've already read them.
From the link:
In his response to my critique of “29 Evidences for Macroevolution,” Dr. Theobald accused me of devious tactics, widespread ignorance, and a host of intellectual sins. I have explained why these self-serving accusations are unfounded. It seems Dr. Theobald was more interested in fitting me with a stereotype, in portraying me as an unworthy critic, than in dealing fairly with what I was saying. His response includes personal attacks on me that do nothing to advance the discussion. They serve only as a cover for weak arguments.