[balrog666]

TOE suggests life from the immaterial.

How do you get that from a threory of allele distributions over time?

Is TOE based strictly upon naturalistic processes or not? If it is, describe to me in any way possible how TOE accounts for symbiotic life? I'll even give you the species (Yucca Moth/Yucca Plant of the American southwest)

As opposed to what - unnatural processes?

What difficulty do you think symbiosis provides to the theory?

And what do you think mitochondria and chloroplasts are?

I'll be watching to see if you smuggle in any concept of Teleology. You want to propose all species descended (ultimately) from single celled animals (That is part of TOE), then give me some equations that describe this "scientific" process! LMAO

Give me an equation for the Theory of Gravity (hint for the stupid: that's not the Law of Gravity).

[conservative_crusader]

"Give me an equation for the Theory of Gravity (hint for the stupid: that's not the Law of Gravity)."

Mass of object x acceleration due to gravity = Force of Gravity

[Jehu]

Come on genius...YOU are the one defending TOE...how does any mechanism proposed by TOE account for symbiotic relationships? I could care less about allele distributions. As I stated in some previous post that bounced off the concrete blocks you Darwinists use for heads.

Allele distributions over time only explains varieties within species, like human blood types. Prove that such a mechanism gives rise to new species...take the pre-requisite "millions of years," you Darwinists use as a proxy for God.