I am as an ambassador, it is my place to speak for God. Well, Mr Ambassador, tell that to all the other theists including the Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Invisible-Pink-Unicornists ...
When you guys work it out between yourselves, then call us.
I've already proved that a god exists, the only way for your position to stand, is for you to prove that wrong. You would not be proving a negative, you would merely use what is given to say that my argument is false. '
What position are you referring to here?
In any case, you have already established your inability to understand the uses and limits of logic.
Does that really matter? I mean a god must exist, which one is real, is left up to faith for the moment.
I think that all the other theists including the Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, etc. might just care.
Oh this is a wonderful argument, not only are you demeaning me, you are using even more Ad Hominem fallacies. Your only response to my argument, is that I have proved nothing.
Good, stayed offended, that way you don't have to learn anything.
Generally, the argument is that I can prove nothing, which is a fallacy.
Don't waste time with more strawmen.
I honestly believe you really don't care what is true,
That's true. My desires don't influence the nature of reality.
you just like arguing with people smarter than you. It makes you feel big!!!
More projecting on your part. I think you need to get a life.
"Well, Mr Ambassador, tell that to all the other theists including the Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Invisible-Pink-Unicornists ..."
They would agree with me. God or a god must exist.
"When you guys work it out between yourselves, then call us."
We already have it worked out, a god exists, beyond the shadow of a doubt.
"What position are you referring to here?"
I am referring to the position saying there is no god. If that is a misrepresentation of your position then argue your position, then say so.
"In any case, you have already established your inability to understand the uses and limits of logic."
I am quite well versed in logic, all I have "established" is that a god must exist, you are arguing ad hominem that I am incapable of understanding logic.
"I think that all the other theists including the Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, etc. might just care."
They do care. They all believe there is a higher power of some kind. A higher power must exist, given my that post #126 is true. Point out the error in that post and you would win the entire argument. But since you refuse to argue anything other than I can't prove anything, I win by default.
"Don't waste time with more strawmen."
So I did prove there is a god?
"That's true. My desires don't influence the nature of reality."
Then you forfeit even the right to argue. Quit arguing a subject if you don't care about it.
"More projecting on your part. I think you need to get a life."
You can't even identify an insult when you see one.I think you need to learn how to argue.