Replies

In answer to your question, It is not your place to argue with the morality of a supreme being,

Is it really your place to speak for any such being or beings? I didn't think so.

you have yet to disprove that one does not exists,

Humm, prove a negative through logic, huh? Wow, you are even more ignorant than I realized.

... whereas I have proved one exists in post #126.

Really? Which one?

Argue that, and then I might lend some credence to your arguments.

[Sigh] You have "proved" nothing except in your own mind. Your inability to understand that obvious point tells us everything to know about you and your "arguments".

"Is it really your place to speak for any such being or beings?"

I am as an ambassador, it is my place to speak for God.

"Humm, prove a negative through logic, huh? Wow, you are even more ignorant than I realized."

I've already proved that a god exists, the only way for your position to stand, is for you to prove that wrong. You would not be proving a negative, you would merely use what is given to say that my argument is false. '

I love your Argumentum Ad Hominem Attack. Will you ever stop using fallacies?

"Really? Which one?"

Does that really matter? I mean a god must exist, which one is real, is left up to faith for the moment.

"You have "proved" nothing except in your own mind. Your inability to understand that obvious point tells us everything to know about you and your "arguments"."

Oh this is a wonderful argument, not only are you demeaning me, you are using even more Ad Hominem fallacies. Your only response to my argument, is that I have proved nothing. Generally, the argument is that I can prove nothing, which is a fallacy. I honestly believe you really don't care what is true, you just like arguing with people smarter than you. It makes you feel big!!!