> Who ruled this was to be a "debate"?
You're right. It's not. It's little more than an evolved version of monkeys hurling their feces at each other.
> repeatedly jumping to unfounded conclusions
Hmm. You mean like:
"You would rather believe anything than consider there is a Creator you must and will answer to someday."
THAT is what I call an unfounded conclusion, jumped to out of ignorance and pride.
Well, except for the "evolved" part, at least you acknowledge your position for what it is.
THAT is what I call an unfounded conclusion,
I wasn't the one who claimed to be "debating." However, my "unfounded conclusion" still seems like a good possibility based on what you've written about the "Christian God" and such.
jumped to out of ignorance and pride.
There you go again. You haven't a clue. Pride has nothing to do with it. Ignorance? Well, if in fact you do 'consider there is a Creator you must and will answer to someday,' I (1) failed to see any evidence of it, (2) trust you'll forgive me, and (3) wonder how you plan to face Him when that day comes.