Well, I'm glad that you have no problem with Intellegent Design being taught in the schools. That is all I was ever trying to say. I have no problem with evolution also being taught, but for it to be presented as "the way that life began" is not right.
As far as intellegent design being taught in science classes, I would disagree that it is not "scientific." Biology may not really deal with the issue, but phyics and chemistry certainly do.
In conclusion, there is alot of "science" in the theory of intellegent design.
If ID is science, then you should have no problem with this. Give me at least one prediction made by ID. It should be a prediction that if it were found to be incorrect would cause you to abandon ID. I have previously posted such a prediction using evolution as a basic principle. If a life form that used something other than nucleic acids as a genetic material were found, evolution would be false. Please provide such a prediction based on ID.