Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Nice to see that someone in the press understands what's going on.
1 posted on 11/29/2004 6:52:42 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: PatrickHenry
but it is reasonable to say that evolution is thoroughly supported by a vast weight of scientific evidence and research.

poppycock

845 posted on 11/30/2004 7:29:39 PM PST by spitlana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

I read the book “The Evolution of a Creationist” By Dr Jobe Martin (ISBN 0-9643665-0-9).

The writer of this article states that teaching kids the other “theory” or assumptions which evolution are based on is a waste of time. In a round about way this author is saying that we should teach only one side and then teach this as the truth and as a matter of fact. Disregard any other information since this would “confuse” the kids.

I think this guy tops the “stupid meter”. Lets not teach another theory which happens to accommodate a religion because “We don’t like anything that gives possible credit to a creator”. We only use science when it gives us the answers we like. Unreal!

The book, if this guy even read it, explains the 7 basic assumptions (Verifiable fact) on which evolution stands. It goes through and explains all the holes and lack of information we have. The extrapolations made and at time the flat out lies that were presented as proof of evolution and attempting to fill those holes. Yes, the book is loaded with quotes from the bible, but this don’t make it wrong.

There are several other books out there that are similar. One is written by a micro biologist and goes into painful detail. He too will surely get a bad review by this guy. After all, he’s not preaching the party line either (evolution=intellectual and educated, creationism=bible thumper and idiot). Is this really a question of science for the writer of that article?

Red6


920 posted on 12/01/2004 3:37:59 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Evolution does not equal science. Evolution is a pitifully-conceived theory. Period. Evolution within a species - no problem there. Monkeys becoming people? Big problem there. Absolute no credible scientific evidence for that.


927 posted on 12/01/2004 4:10:58 PM PST by DennisR (Look around - there are countless unmistakable hints that God exists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Teach both then debate it.


1,211 posted on 12/03/2004 5:40:10 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
The evolutionists are going to wake-up to the fact that there is indeed a higher force in the universe that intervenes in the affairs of humankind very soon. The process of this awakening is speeding up right now.
1,372 posted on 12/05/2004 3:27:34 AM PST by Bandaneira (The Third Temple/House for All Nations/World Peace Centre...Coming Soon...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
THE COMPONENTS OF CONSCIOUSNESS

Divine Status – i.e Gift from the Master of the Universe i.e Special Skills, Talents, Insights

Memory – Those feelings, thoughts, experiences remembered from times past

Life Experience – Parents, Conditioning, Trauma, Travel, Friends, Relationships, People, Media etc.

Imagination – Creative Visualization

Creativity – Structured / Unstructured

Sleep – Unremembered Processing / Dreams

Intuition – Conscience, Gut Feel, Hunch

Fears – Rational / Irrational

Near Sleep – Drifting Off / Just After Waking

Prayer – Silent / Vocal

Kinaesthetic – Dance, Exercise, Day-toDay Activity

Meditation – Contemplation, Daydreaming, Silent, Group




Please tell me how the theory of evolution explains consciousness ?
1,373 posted on 12/05/2004 3:37:16 AM PST by Bandaneira (The Third Temple/House for All Nations/World Peace Centre...Coming Soon...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Memory, n. Faculty of remembering; this in an individual, as a good, bad, ~ (convenient or accommodating ~, that retains only what it is to one’s interest to remember); recollection; information storage device in computer; in ~ of, as a record of, to keep alive the ~ of; posthumous repute, as his ~ has been censured, of blessed, happy, etc., ~ (used esp. of deceased princes etc.); length of time over which ~ extends, as beyond, within, the ~ of men, within living ~. [ME f. OF memorie, memoire f. L memoria f. memor mindful ]


1,374 posted on 12/05/2004 3:41:25 AM PST by Bandaneira (The Third Temple/House for All Nations/World Peace Centre...Coming Soon...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

We were all created. Many devolve.


1,687 posted on 12/07/2004 6:58:08 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson