Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
However, the Bush twins likely could not make a claim, as discriminating against Republicans will not generally disproportionately harm members of any "protected class."

How about "Evangelical Christian"? :) Granted, we've not in the past thought of them as "protected," yet discrimination based upon religion IS in the list.
356 posted on 11/19/2004 10:41:04 PM PST by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGreg

From what I've now read it looks like this story is an urban legend, not true ... that's good news.


357 posted on 11/19/2004 10:53:25 PM PST by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg

Dear TexasGreg,

I think that if folks discriminate, and say its because of political affiliation, it might be hard to assert a cause of action based on religious discrimination.

The fact is that large numbers of Methodists (probably an absolute majority) voted Dem. The Bush twins, as far as I know, are Methodists.

Even if they were part of some group that did vote majority Republican, it would be tough to make out a case, perhaps, of disparate impact. You'd have to find a group that went, say, 3 - 1 or 4 - 1 for Bush.


sitetest


364 posted on 11/20/2004 6:12:32 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson