Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist; capitan_refugio
I am discussing the Confederate Constitution that was to replace the U.S. Constitution.

That is an original source document is it not?

That was the Government that was going to be formed instead of the tyrannical American Gov't was it not?

I have seen how you discuss history with your double talk and evasion.

So we will discuss Southern goals and plans for the great noble experiment in freedom, the CSA!

970 posted on 11/24/2004 12:32:16 AM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 961 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration
I am discussing the Confederate Constitution that was to replace the U.S. Constitution.

First off, you are arbitrarily spouting inanities about it with no end, no point of contention, and no purpose to this debate. Second, the confederate constitution did NOT seek to replace the U.S. constitution but rather would have coexisted with it as it continued to govern a neighboring country.

That is an original source document is it not?

Indeed it is. The question remains though over why you began randomly quoting from it (and inserting rhetorical bombs along side your quotes in an apparent attempt to bait others into discussing it) in the middle of a discussion about different matters entirely. But who am I to ask you that? Perhaps you're also one of those types who breaks out into song and dance for no apparent purpose in the middle of street intersections.

975 posted on 11/24/2004 12:38:05 AM PST by GOPcapitalist ("Marxism finds it easy to ally with Islamic zealotism" - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 970 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson