[GOPcapitalist]

As I just posted to your comrade, LG, I wasn't talking about the original source material - which you procede to misinerpret. I am talking about recognized authorities in the field who agree with your interpretation.

Original source material is always superior to the ad verecundiam fallacy you rely so heavily upon. That's why you always end up limbless in these debates.

[capitan_refugio]

"Original source material is always superior to the ad verecundiam fallacy you rely so heavily upon."

The problem is, you have demonstrated no understanding of the original source material. Which is why you are so obviously in error. Your arguments are unsupported and unsupportable. They amount to nothing more than your feeble attempts at legitimizing your fringist ideas. Your insistent repetition of your misinterpretations don't make them any less invalid.