Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus; fortheDeclaration
"He wanted Congress out of session and preferably out of town while he "handled things" in a manner absolutely inconsistent with the Constitution, inconsistent to a degree that required indemnification later -- "high crimes and misdemeanors", unless Lyman Trumbull could hornswoggle the Indemnification Bill through a sleeping Senate chamber in the dead of night."

As much as the Peace Democrats in the Senate wanted to leave Lincoln "hung out to dry," there was no chance of impeachment. Congress supported Lincoln's conduct of the war, and retrospectively approved all of his actions taken at a time when the fate of the Nation was in the balance. Professor Farber has adequately explained the background to the Habeas Corpus Bill of 1863, sometimes mislabeled the "Indemnity Act," and demonstrated the legality of the congressional action.

Congress, by the way, even during the Civil War, did not meet year round. For instance, in 1863, the entire Congress did not even meet from early March until early December (by their own schedule).

Lincoln governed the Nation much of the time, not in spite of the Congress, but in the absence of Congress.

2,470 posted on 12/07/2004 9:04:27 AM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2458 | View Replies ]


To: capitan_refugio
Excellent post.

Gee, you think that the fact there was a little matter of a civil war resulted in Congress's deference to Lincoln and his role as commander and chief?

2,547 posted on 12/07/2004 8:37:03 PM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2470 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson