Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist

The difference is that he was speaking of new formations from the territory purchased which might never even be admitted as states in the first place. Thus, it would have been perfectly constitutional had Arkansas organized as a territory and petitioned Congress to be allowed to form a separate nation and Congress agreed.

But to attempt to destroy and organic unity such as was created by the Union is like taking an arm off a body.


2,045 posted on 12/02/2004 7:32:13 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1967 | View Replies ]


To: justshutupandtakeit
The difference is that he was speaking of new formations from the territory purchased which might never even be admitted as states in the first place.

You're being slothful again, fakeit. Jefferson specifically talks of their departure from the UNION, mentioning the word union by name. He gives absolutely no reason whatsoever to support your bizarre claim that he was talking about anything other than future states.

2,080 posted on 12/02/2004 9:44:52 AM PST by GOPcapitalist ("Marxism finds it easy to ally with Islamic zealotism" - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2045 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson