There was nothing in my statement which said Hamilton was immune from criticism even by his enemies merely acknowledgement that it is deceptive and dishonest to use the portrait painted by those who hated him pretending that it was from an objective source. It has no more value than me quoting Rufus King extolling him without noting their close alliance.
Quoting a Yates is not going to convince anyone who actually knows anything about him or that period.
Nor is there any "evidence" of those economic failures merely opinion based upon ideology.
There is "not any evidence" that interventionalism is a failed economic strategy?