Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
What "legal penalties" was Lincoln facing? None. What was the law that criminalized his actions? There wasn't one.

You once tried to make the case that the President's actions were impeachable. That didn't go very far either.

1,712 posted on 11/29/2004 12:12:30 PM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1706 | View Replies ]


To: capitan_refugio; lentulusgracchus
What "legal penalties" was Lincoln facing? None.

Actually, he disobeyed five federal court orders and was found by one federal court to have illegally arrested the judicial process. So, as usual, you are simply wrong or fibbing.

What was the law that criminalized his actions? There wasn't one.

The Judiciary Act of 1789 for starters criminalizes them, and shows once again that you are simply wrong or fibbing.

Sec. 17. And be it further enacted, That all the courts of the United States shall have power to grant new trials, in cases where there has been a trial by jury for reasons for which new trials have usually been granted in the courts of law; and shall have power to impose and administer all necessary oaths or affirmations, and to punish by fine or imprisonment, at the discretion of said courts, all contempts of authority in any cause or hearing before the same;

You once tried to make the case that the President's actions were impeachable.

They were.

1,714 posted on 11/29/2004 1:05:05 PM PST by GOPcapitalist ("Marxism finds it easy to ally with Islamic zealotism" - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1712 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson