You are correct. I used the wrong term. The process I was referring to was the transferral of criminal custody. Whoever held Merryman at the time was responsible for notifying Taney of the suspension. That fell to Cadwalader.
Please provide the source of your expert opinion on Criminal Procedure.
Are you saying Cadwallader was required to merely "notify" Chief Justice Taney, or provide evidence of a lawful suspension of the privilege of the writ?
Are you saying Cadwallader was required to "notify" Taney upon his receipt of Merryman, or upon the authorization to suspend the privilege of the writ?
Was the Great Usurper required to notify anyone when he usurped Legislative authority?
Was the Great Usurper required to notify anyone when he raped the Constitution and authorized military officers to suspend the privilege at THEIR discretion, and to delegate the unconstitutional authorization further?
What is the process of transfer of criminal custody? How does it work when the receiving officer does not know why the person is being held?