Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus
"And why do you keep addressing nolu chan and "nolu coward"?"

Nolu coward is the master of bombast. In the last month I have called him out twice on his slander, in matters that are easily provable, and using a neutral third party to hold a wager. He had twice run away. "Coward" aptly describes his behavior.

Several of the cabal enjoy throwing around epithets such as "liar," "marxist," etc. One of you does it and the others ape him. You have formed one big confederate circle jerk at FR. That's fine with me. I will treat you all with the same level of consideration. You act like jackbooted thugs, and you will be treated like jackbooted thugs.

You will notice that there are posters who support the confederate positions who receive a polite level of respect from me. I appreciate their input, even though I may not agree with some or all of their conclusions. That is how the level of debate should proceed, in my opinion.

"Just how many federal judges does it take for you to recognize contempt of court?"

How many judges held the President in contempt of court?

1,455 posted on 11/26/2004 9:07:19 PM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1438 | View Replies ]


To: capitan_refugio; GOPcapitalist
How many judges held the President in contempt of court?

The act, not the holding -- two different things.

Good question, though, let's ask GOPcapitalist, I think he would have the best knowledge wherewith to attempt a count.

How many times, GOPcap, did Honest Abe the Railsplitter display contempt of court by either snapping his fingers at court orders or interfering with judges and courts?

1,461 posted on 11/26/2004 9:21:38 PM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1455 | View Replies ]

To: capitan_refugio; lentulusgracchus
How many judges held the President in contempt of court?

At least one.

The D.C. Circuit Court held his direct agent Andrew Porter, who was acting on his orders, in contempt for his house arrest and harassment of Judge Merrick. Lincoln subsequently intervened and prevented the court authorities from delivering the contempt summons. In responding to Lincoln's intervention, the Circuit Court formally ruled that "the President" had "arrest[ed] the process of this Court" by harassing Judge Merrick and blocking the contempt order from being served on Porter (2 Hay. & Haz. 394; 1861 U.S. App.)

The ruling also states that Lincoln "assumes the responsibility of the acts of General Porter, set forth in the rule, and sanctions them by his orders to Deputy Marshal Philips not to serve the process on the Provost Marshal." It concludes by ordering this material printed in the court's register along with a note that the court, though it has ruled against Lincoln, lacks the "physical power" to enforce it any further against a president who has the military at his disposal.

1,468 posted on 11/26/2004 9:38:51 PM PST by GOPcapitalist ("Marxism finds it easy to ally with Islamic zealotism" - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1455 | View Replies ]

To: capitan_refugio; lentulusgracchus
[capitan_kerryfugio] Nolu coward is the master of bombast. In the last month I have called him out twice on his slander, in matters that are easily provable, and using a neutral third party to hold a wager. He had twice run away. "Coward" aptly describes his behavior.

What a load of crap.

CAPITAN was caught LYING yet again and typically tried to WEASEL his way out.

All will note he gives no example of any alleged slander, although allegedly easy to prove, in his mind only.

I did NOT back out of the (absurd) wager, I UPPED THE ANTE and capitan backed out.

One must consider the prospect of an anonymous person on FR known only by a handle as a "neutral" third party, arbitrating the credibility of a proven liar such as capitan.

Among others, we have ALREADY exposed one Brigade member as a Neo-Nazi crackpot, and another, ahem, has, so to speak, exposed himself.

capitan cannot offer any valid defense of the lies he posted because they are lies and there is no defense.

ALL can simply compare the evidence provided and decide for him or her self. We do not need a "neutral" third party arbitrator provided by capitan.

1,530 posted on 11/27/2004 8:41:07 AM PST by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1455 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson