When attributed to Scott v. Sandford, it is scurrilous bullcrap. When then trying to lie your way out by saying it is part of the Dred Scott record, it is pathetic.
Dred Scott was a complex case with a long history. What transpired throughout those years is all part of the history of the case. What is pathetic is that you are unable to argue the substance and resort to personal attacks. But that is what we have come to expect from you.