What Second Amendment?
that judge will be found as the target of those who believe that we are still ruled under the COnstitution of the United States.
that "judge" (aka scumbag lawyer!) needs to be immediately arrested by FEDERAL officers (since he has broken federal law) tried, convicted and hanged by ..... until dead.
BULL$*@^!!!!!
I'm not going to take the side of an abuser and scream 2nd Ammd ... 2nd Ammd.
If you want to keepy your guns, as I intend to keep mine:
#1 Don't beat your wife/gf, and
#2 If your kid beats/threatens his lady, then kick his sorry a$$ to the curb (and out of your domecile)
It's an easy equation.
This is not as much about gun rights as it is about some dumba$$ who thinks its ok to threaten his lady - with a gun. An irresponsible and dangerous owner is the problem in this case. It is irresponsible and dangerous owners who are the ones creating problems for those of us who own, train, and mantain our rights responsibly.
Look at the genesis: If he wasn't abusing his gf there would be no problem. Solution - don't be a punk coward who gets off on threatening/abusing women. And I, for one, will NOT defend said loser in any way, shape, or form.
[/soap box]
More security-by-confiscation bovine excrement. An abusive person will abuse without guns; he will hurt people without guns; he can certainly kill without guns.
We ought to be glad this yahoo is disarmed.
Lessee now, she went to visit him and he threatened to kill her with a gun. So she's going to go back and visit him after the guns are gone because she knows he loves her and they will live happily ever after.
Or
They are living together in his father's house and she doesn't have a job and can't support herself.
I think the courts have far more important cases to resolve than to encourage the girl to live in a war zone, knowing it will only be a matter of time before they will have to issue a restraining order against her boyfriend's fists.
This isn't a 2nd Amendment issue. It's an assault issue.
This guy is dangerous.
What if the alleged abuser attended a church that advocated strict harsh domination and control by hubsands of their wives? Would the judge have the guts to violate the 1st amendment the way he violated the 2nd amendment by ordering a confiscation of all those church's religious materials in his home?
Ping
If there were legitimate gounds to confiscate his guns, there were legitimate grounds to lock him up. And the latter would have been much more appropriate, since he can always use a baseball bat or kitchen knife.
Someone needs to take this Judge to the wood shed.
Preferably with a 2 by 4