Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
Actually, ideas similar to that have been floated around here in the past.

Now, tell me which logical fallacy category would your iquiring of the sexual orientation of those who seem to not be offended by homosexuals fall into? It's rather humorous...almost childlike. "Oh, you aren't offended by them! You must be one!".

130 posted on 10/12/2004 1:32:45 PM PDT by Bella_Bru (It's for the children = It takes a village)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: Bella_Bru

Just wondered, since you so adamantly criticize those who support traditional morality. And then cast innuendo on them as well. IOW, social conservatives are suspect just for holding to traditional morality, must be closet homosexuals. That was your innuendo, and it is a standard "gay" agenda talking point.

You are not offended by homosexuality (don't know whether you are offended by kids being indoctrinated by the "gay" agenda in schools or not) but you are offended by those of us who are opposed. So you have a right to your viewpoint, and we do not? You, who are so tolerant of homosexuals, can't tolerate social conservatives?


134 posted on 10/12/2004 1:36:54 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Marriage is the bedrock of human civilization. Destroy marriage, destroy human civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson