Replies

"Now......to my understanding - discussing private freeps without the consent of the other is not allowed - hence my ping to the mod"

In fairness to Pilgrim, I remember reading this discussion on another post. While there may have been some mail passed back and forth of which I am not aware, it was clearly part of the discussion of one of the posts that I was perusing.

Rarely do I do so nor do I like putting myself in the middle of these types of discussions, but I thought I would ping the Moderator to ensure the record is accurate. My apologies to the Mod who is a busy person here.

While there may have been some mail passed back and forth of which I am not aware,

thats accurate

it was clearly part of the discussion of one of the posts that I was perusing.

links please - you guys squeal like a bad wheelbearing when we make an assertion without a link - and such a statement can not be construed as an opinion - so please, the link

Besides - he plainly referred to the email - not any supposed post Oh, I see. So that personal message you sent me......

so cut the nonsensical diversion by stating it was posted and quit pinging me to this thread

but I thought I would ping the Moderator to ensure the record is accurate.

by your simple assertion ? ......links please

You guys have lamb basted everyone of us for not providing links in the past-

If youre going to make an assertion that the record be factual - please provide a link where the warmoose / pilgrim similarity was discussed openly on the threads

post 307 ought to be deleted and thepilgrim reprimanded for discussing private freeps openly

In reality, Harley, there is great irony in Rev's words.

You see, unbeknownst to you and thePilgrim, Rev was part of an email group with many of the Calvinists. This email group was not hosted on FreeRepublic, but we all knew each other from FreeRepublic. Rev did not participate all that much, but when he did, he was welcomed and was considered a friend.

Now to the irony. Rev may have pinged the RM regarding thePilgrim's posting of private FRmail to the public forum.

But the irony is that Rev himself posted information to FreeRepublic from those private emails from that private email group. He posted out of context with the intent of making the Calvinists look bad.

So, it is only out of hypocricy (he never apologized nor asked for forgiveness for this breech of trust) that he pings the RM to the apparent rule violation of thePilgrim.

I can only see the rationale behind his motivations as an attempt to get thePilgrim banned.

It seems to be the M.O. of the "neeners" to attempt to silence the Calvinists.

When they simply cannot respond to the arguments presented or to the critiques of their own theology, they either demand any specific Calvinist to refrain from pinging them, or they attempt to bring in the moderator in the hopes that the moderator will make notes on what the "neeners" think are abuses of FR rules by the Calvinists.

In the end, I fully believe that you are correct in your feeling that there is an orchestrated attempt to get the Calvinists of of FreeRepublic.

Jean

Luke 6:22
Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you from their company, and shall reproach you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake.