Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: capitan_refugio
Attorney General Caleb Cushing of MA, who who show his stripes later when he bolted the Northern/Douglas wing of the Democrat Party to preside over the nomination of John Breckinridge

Your source makes it sound as if Breckinridge's candidacy was some fringe outsider challenge for the nomination. In reality, Breckinridge was the INCUMBENT vice president from a moderate border state (Kentucky) and thus his party's heir apparent for the nomination. If anything, Breckinridge was the status quo candidate in 1860.

79 posted on 08/24/2004 8:47:50 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist ("Can Lincoln expect to subjugate a people thus resolved? No!" - Sam Houston, 3/1863)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: GOPcapitalist
I think you are fully aware of the split caused in the Democrat Party by the walkout of the fire-eaters in the 1860 Charleston Convention. The Democrat party was, in essence, the last "national" political organization at the time. The southerners had been offended by the positions taken by Sen. Stephen Douglas (the real "heir apparent") on the Lecompton Constitution and his "Freeport Doctrine". In fact, in the 1856 convention, Douglas had been the South's favorite son when he received 37 of 48 Southern convention delegates in Cincinnati.

It is said that Douglas and Breckinridge were the favorite candidates; however, the convention broke up over the slavery plank (with Southerners insisting that no government - federal, state, or local - could outlaw slavery in the territories) before the balloting for the Presidential nomination began. Several authors suggest that the real reason behind the break-up was that the Southerners did not have the strength any longer to enforce their will in the convention and were unwilling to compromise. Likewise, they did not have the voting strength to force a Breckinridge candidacy. When the Democrats reconvened in their traditional convention city of Baltimore, the remaining Southerners again walked out.

The split in the Democrat Party, as much as anything else, ensured Lincoln's election as President.

As it was, Breckinridge was somewhat of a reluctant candidate and eventually garnered only 18% of the popular vote. Douglas, the mainsteam candidate of the Democrats was able to take nearly 30% of the popular vote, but only carried Missouri and split electoral votes from New Jersey. The combined popular vote of Breckinridge and Douglas would have swamped Lincoln, but a careful analysis of the distribution of votes indicates it would have remained a close Lincoln victory in the Electoral College. Even if Douglas had all of Breckinridge's electoral votes, and Bell's too, he still was short (pardon the pun). Of course, there is no way to know how well Breckinridge would have polled in the North instead of Douglas. He may possibly have taken one or two states Lincoln won in close voting, but more likely, he would have done no better than Douglas.

The bottom line is that the breakaway Breckinridge candidacy facilitated Lincoln's election.

87 posted on 08/24/2004 12:09:36 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson