Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: nolu chan

4CJ can speak for himself. You have already spoken for yourself.


388 posted on 08/31/2004 3:23:15 AM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]


To: capitan_refugio; GOPcapitalist; 4ConservativeJustices; Gianni
[cr] 4CJ can speak for himself. You have already spoken for yourself.

At #380, I wrote "We know your position. Those lacking your ignorance have a different opinion. "Never Forget" In 1959 the Israeli Knesset passed another special law creating YOM HASHOAH, Holocaust Remembrance Day, to be observed each year on the 27th day of the month of Nissan, according to the Jewish calendar. This date coincides with the beginning of the heroic revolt against the Nazis by Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943. It usually occurs in April."

AT #360, GOPcap wrote: "I take it that in your perverse world "bigotry, predjudice, and racism" is defined to be the act of denouncing nazis and getting aryan nation types like your buddy #3 kicked off the forum? Strange..."

At #356, Gianni said "It's painfully obvious what you're trying to do. Such may be acceptable in a strip 100 miles inland between LALA land and the Land of Fruits and Nuts. In the balance of the country, it's the mark of a true ass. I'm asking nicely: Please, pretty please with sugar on top, knock it off."

At #351, I said "An accurate quote of Hitler or anyone else is acceptable. What is unacceptable is espousing or praising the doctrine therein, such as was done by the most recently banned brigade member. He was not smeared, he was quoting and espousing neo-nazi doctrine. The other thread where he was posting the same neo-nazi doctrine was also pulled in its entirety and none of us was on that thread at all. That clearly narrows down the reason the two threads were pulled."

At #335, 4CJ wrote "Nazi views? ROTFL!!!! Sorry to disappoint, but to me ALL men are children of God - all descended from Adam and Eve. All equal. It was #3Idiot, a poster on your side, that espoused a separatist/white supremacist position."

Back at #321, 4CJ called Hitler a "bloviating idiot."

You have been asked repeatedly, "do you or do you not agree with the view of the union described by Hitler in that quote?" You seem to be the only one unable to speak for yourself. So, is it that you can't make up your mind whether you agree with it or not, or you can't admit that you agree with it?

397 posted on 08/31/2004 6:56:46 AM PDT by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]

To: capitan_refugio
4CJ can speak for himself. You have already spoken for yourself.

Nolu chan wrote pointed out that my position was that Hitler (among others) was a bloviating idiot. Hitler was a rascist, a believer of white supremacy, and a white separatist responsible for some of the wort atrocities ever committed by man. I disavow ANY and ALL such racial positions, I have been adamant from day one - I believe that we are ALL God's children, descended from one set of parents - Adam and Eve. We are all brothers, there was no second creation responsible for separate races, nor are blacks the exclusive descendants of Cain.

Nolu chan wrote, "An accurate quote of Hitler or anyone else is acceptable. What is unacceptable is espousing or praising the doctrine therein, such as was done by the most recently banned brigade member. He was not smeared, he was quoting and espousing neo-nazi doctrine." I agree.

398 posted on 08/31/2004 7:03:36 AM PDT by 4CJ (||) Men die by the calendar, but nations die by their character. - John Armor, 5 Jun 2004 (||)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]

To: capitan_refugio; 4ConservativeJustices; nolu chan; Gianni; lentulusgracchus
4CJ can speak for himself. You have already spoken for yourself.

For somebody who has been making so many demands of others to state their positions on Hitler, you've been oddly silent on your own position. So how 'bout an answer, capitan? Hitler said:

"[I]t is impossible to speak of original sovereignty in regard to the majority of the states. Many of them were not included in the federal complex until long after it had been established. The states that make up the American Union are mostly in the nature of territories, more or less, formed for technical administrative purposes, their boundaries having in many cases been fixed in the mapping office. Originally these states did not and could not possess sovereign rights of their own. Because it was the Union that created most of the so-called states."

Now - do you either agree or disagree with this statement?


409 posted on 08/31/2004 9:10:24 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist ("Can Lincoln expect to subjugate a people thus resolved? No!" - Sam Houston, 3/1863)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson