[Gianni]

Didn't name redacted hold to some of the same positions as Lincoln?

With respect to the nature of the Union, the same positions espoused by Lincoln's modern-day apologists, even if different from those of the man himself.

I believe it all started with a note that Lincoln and name redacted used indifferentiable methods to overthrow the civil authority with military force, regardless of where either ultimately took it. Rather than respond properly, or point out any flaw in the argument itself, it looks like screaming and stomping of feet seemed like the thing to do.

[TexConfederate1861]

Just a question...:)

Surely you don't agree with the infamous WLAT aka Whiskey Papa, aka: Confederate hating sc*mbag's quote? :)

(On your homepage)

[4CJ]

Rather than respond properly, or point out any flaw in the argument itself, it looks like screaming and stomping of feet seemed like the thing to do.

Gianni's First Law.

[4CJ]

I believe it all started with a note that Lincoln and name redacted used indifferentiable methods to overthrow the civil authority with military force, regardless of where either ultimately took it.

Bump. Lincoln good, name redacted bad. Lincoln's armies slaughtering, raping and starving innocent Southern women and children is good, name redacted's armies slaughtering, raping and starving innocent Jewish women and children is bad. Lincoln starving Southerners is good, name redacted starving Jews is bad.

It's seems they want glorify Lincoln almost to point of worship, yet pretend name redacted and his evil never existed. Strange.