[capitan_refugio]

You seemed to have gone full circle again. And you failed to reference #2832 and #2855. My #2825 continued the discussion with another poster using his terminology. That's when you butted in. I corrected the imprecision in my original statement.

Interesting that you would note that you lived in the "UK" for five years. My family lived there too - Lowndes Square, London, near the Knightsbridge Station - for about 5 years too. I was in college then, so I don't claim London as a home, but I was a frequent enough visitor to know what island I was on. Funny how you missed that. Were you in a drug-induced stupor at the time?

[nolu chan]

[cr #2968] Interesting that you would note that you lived in the "UK" for five years. ... I was a frequent enough visitor to know what island I was on. Funny how you missed that.

I lived in the UK for a few years without setting foot upon Great Britain. I knew where I was at. I even knew what country I was in, unlike you. It is a shame you did not learn anything while you were there.

You should try to tell a Catholic from Northern Ireland that they are British and see how far you get.

And they still issue passports which correctly identify the nation-state as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

In cr #2825 you said "Great Britain exists as a nation-state." You were wrong then and you are still wrong.